3.2.2. Tap water

Jegyzet elhelyezéséhez, kérjük, lépj be.!

News about microplastics (MP) in drinking water first appeared in the media in 2017, and many scientific publications followed them in 2018. Regarding drinking water, experts [84] believe that three important areas should be considered:

Jegyzet elhelyezéséhez, kérjük, lépj be.!

  1. What is the evidence of MPs in drinking water?
  2. How do MPs enter drinking water?
  3. What are their toxicological consequences for humans?
 

Jegyzet elhelyezéséhez, kérjük, lépj be.!

These questions are reviewed by presenting evidence for MPs in tap water, bottled water, and in the influent and effluent of high-efficiency wastewater treatment plants to discuss the possible routes by which MPs reach consumers. An easy-to-understand diagram illustrates the possible routes of MPs entering drinking water from industrial, agricultural, and residential areas to the water extraction sites of drinking water treatment plants (Figure 4).
 

Jegyzet elhelyezéséhez, kérjük, lépj be.!

Figure 4. The entry routes of microplastics leading to drinking water sources are indicated by black arrows [84]
 

Jegyzet elhelyezéséhez, kérjük, lépj be.!

They address the possible effects of MPs on humans. They note that concentrations of MP in drinking water represent only a small fraction of the total dietary intake of environmental pollutants and additives. They also note that there are other potentially significant routes of exposure in addition to food (e.g. inhalation of MP particles from household dust). They show the preliminary assessment of human exposure, e.g. that MPs in the body can cause oxidative stress, which is associated with chronic inflammation and tissue damage; although the migration of MP particles in the living organism is unique, it has been observed that PE particles up to 50 µm migrate from lymph nodes to the liver and the spleen, where they cause inflammation and immune response.

Jegyzet elhelyezéséhez, kérjük, lépj be.!

Fortunately, there are few microplastics in drinking water from groundwater sources. Mintenig and his colleagues [85] analyzed the occurrence of microplastics in the groundwater source and in the drinking water obtained from it. The samples were collected from different points of the drinking water supply, the samples were filtered (through a 3 μm filter) and particles above 20 μm were analyzed by FTIR spectroscopy. Both fibers and particles were found in the blank sample (0.67 particles/L, 0.3 fibers/L), indicating that these can also enter the filter unit during sample processing, which were excluded from the analysis. The average microplastic concentration was 0.0007 particles/L, varying between 0 and 0.007 particles/L in both raw water and drinking water. Regarding their material quality, the particles were identified as PE, PA, PEST, PVC or epoxy resin, and their size ranged from 50 to 150 µm. According to the authors, the plastic particles detected in the water samples probably come from the wear and tear of plastic equipment used in water treatment or transportation.

Jegyzet elhelyezéséhez, kérjük, lépj be.!

Significantly larger amounts were reported [86] for the microplastic content of the raw and treated water from surface sources of three drinking water providers in the Czech Republic (Drinking Water Treatment Plants [DWTP]). Samples were sequentially filtered through 5 and 0.2 µm membrane filters and oxidized with peroxide. Sections of the filters were analyzed by electron microscopy to determine the number, shape, and size of the particles. Particles larger than 10 µm were characterized by FTIR and particles larger than 1 µm were characterized by Raman spectroscopy. The amount of microplastic pollution in all water samples was in the range of 1473-3605 particles/L and in the range of 338–628 particles/L in treated drinking water. The background contamination determined by blank filter analysis was negligible, less than 5%. A typical removal efficiency of 70-80% was found during drinking water treatment. Contamination by microplastics smaller than 10 μm dominated in both raw and treated water samples, accounting for up to 95% of the particles found. In terms of the material quality of the microplastic particles, 12 different materials were identified, but the majority of the contamination (70%) consisted of PET, PP, and PE.
Tartalomjegyzék navigate_next
Keresés a kiadványban navigate_next

A kereséshez, kérjük, lépj be!
Könyvjelzőim navigate_next
A könyvjelzők használatához
be kell jelentkezned.
Jegyzeteim navigate_next
Jegyzetek létrehozásához
be kell jelentkezned.
    Kiemeléseim navigate_next
    Mutasd a szövegben:
    Szűrés:

    Kiemelések létrehozásához
    MeRSZ+ előfizetés szükséges.
      Útmutató elindítása
      delete
      Kivonat
      fullscreenclose
      printsave